Search Useless Ramblings

Friday, 11 May 2012

# 3 - Saurav Ganguly

It's been a while hasn't it? To be honest, there were hardly any topics that pushed me to write, until now that is..


Saurav Ganguly, Dada, that eternal fighter, has been thrown (if I may use that word) out of his team again.

To be honest, he had it coming, the indications were clear during last year's IPL auctions, but there was still hope in the form of a certain Mr. Subroto Roy, but this year, the saviour turned sour, the poor Win/Loss ratios and the bad publicity got to him, like so many others, and thud went the axe and not the auctioneer's hammer.

Also, his personal form had probably never been worse, he's been struggling throughout the fifth edition of IPL, during the earlier slumps he had age on his side, but now he is touching 40, and this time, we are pretty much sure that this is it....we won't see him bat again, ever.

But, we've been proven wrong before, haven't we?

It's as if he does it on purpose, our group of Ganguly fans have time and again thrown up our hands (like millions of others) and said Naah, aar kono upay nei, ebaare jete hobe ('No, there's no other way, he'll have to quit') or other regional variations of the same phrase, for Ganguly's appeal is not restricted to any particular state..and before we know it, he has somehow managed to enter into the field again, speaking and acting as if he had never left...and us fans, those who had thought all was lost, are suddenly backing him again, spitting fire at all those who dared to criticise him.

Why do we back him? Why do we stand up for him when we know deep within our hearts that he is well past his peak and that it just doesn't make sense playing him in a team where he is the oldest, slowest guy around, 'for his captaincy moron' you say, and try to convince yourself, he is the best captain that India's ever produced, right?

Maybe....but tell that to the other 10 guys, what right does the 'has been' player have to tell us how to bowl, bat, field or run when he can't save his life doing any of the above four?

 Public Demand, goddamnit....we want to see him play. We don't care if he is the slowest man in the stadium or the planet, we don't watch Salman Khan movies because they make sense do we?

The truth is, he is the king of comebacks, every time we write him off, he just somehow crawls back, and we are there watching if he can pull it off again, an innings of 38 runs scored from 38 balls isn't remotely worth mentioning, but last year, in IPL 4, that's what he did, and the crowds? They went crazy, one could have been forgiven for thinking that he had score 220 runs in 60 balls, that's how we reacted. A fanatic somehow managed to get onto the field and prostrated before him, summing up all the emotions.

I believe, we are all backing for dada because he is the underdog, everyone has written him off, he has no chance whatsoever, and we somehow feel that we too are like him, wronged and thirsting for vengeance.

Imagine, the Australian coach he managed to get for the Indian team, the most high profile job a cricket coach can have, how does he pay off his gratitude, by dropping him from the team of course. The multi-millionaire actor/owner of the city franchise, what does he do to the captain, the city's blue eyed boy? Sack him from the post and subsequently the team in spite of the fact that at that point of time, after 3 editions of IPL he was the leading run-getter in the team...he had been wronged. But can he salvage his pride? Can he give it back with interest to the very people who had written him off, we sure hope so.

Rather, we hoped so.

This time, it's pretty much final, he is gone for good. Sure, we'll see him again, as a commentator, as a cricket expert, but it won't be the same. The royal bengal tiger belongs to the wilderness, not in a zoo, but that's how life is. Sure, we would love it if he went out with a bang, but time never sits still for anyone, and it's time that we, and he, realise that.

 But here's hoping against hope for that one last chance, for that one last moment of brilliance where he makes us get up and take notice, muttering in amazement, dada is dada. He's still got it. 

Image from here.

Monday, 20 June 2011

#2

Public demand brings me back (see one comment to my earlier post).
I scratched my head and other parts, trying to think of something to write about.
Cricket, naaah....recent events, naah (the last time I read a newspaper was on 26th September, 2010, and that was the horoscope section), so here I am, writing about......umm...

SUPERHERO MOVIES

It all started with Superman (and sequels), then it was Batman, then He-Man, then Phantom, then Spiderman, then Blade, then Catwoman, then Batman again, oh and I almost forgot about X-Men, Superman (again), Thor, Fantastic 4, Hulk, Ironman etc. etc. etc.

The latest marvel from Marvel Comics just hit the screen - The Green Lantern, to ho-hum response from critics.

I didn't think it was terrible, but it wasn't a Christopher Nolan either. Let's face it, you can only show so much in a superhero movie, especially when its an origin story, first there's a guy, either he is a loser, or he is sore, or he is a sore loser. In any case, in all likelihood, he isn't happy with his life.

Then comes the agent, he becomes a superhero, either by his own conscious will, or he is forced to become one. Fifteen minutes of screen time is generally devoted to this, where the soon-to-be-superhero learns the magnitude of his powers and how to use it. For reasons best known to the directors, there are comical interludes in this portion ("GO web", "Power up" etc.) and I have time and again heard fellow viewers laugh at this point of time in the movie, could be due to the antics of the hero, or by habit, or simply because the guy next to him is laughing.

Next comes the enemy, the nemesis, or as we say in Bollywood and Comicworld, THE VILLAIN (my ex-roommate's nickname was Villain, an irrelevant fact, but someday the story will be revealed by me). The Villain brings a purpose to the hero, is pure evil, and in most cases, more of a treat to watch (the joker anyone?). The confrontation invariably follows, and herein lies the treat to the moviegoers. Whether a movie will work or not, often depends upon the screentime devoted to the confrontation. In some cases, in order to increase the confrontation bits, there are multiple villains. It worked in IRONMAN, it didn't in SPIDERMAN 3, and I don't know the plot of Krrish 2 (aka Koi Mil Gaya 3) yet.

Oh, I almost forgot, the Superhero must have an weakness, it could be a particular molecule, exposure or lack of exposure to rays of the sun, the fact that he must protect his identity, his family members, or simply.....women.

Dear Reader(s), you must understand that while your enjoyment is my priority, there are limits to my (a) time (b) creativity and (c) electricity bill. Therefore, this post will be finished at a later time. We will call it the sequel.

Till then....

Thursday, 9 June 2011

#1

As the title says, this blog is going to comprise of mostly useless ramblings about useless topics that mostly noone is going to be interested in.

Possible topics can vary from the pink spot on my monitor (where did it come from? will it go away? is there a reason for me to worry?) to my exciting breakfast (ever wondered how Maggi tastes in tea?).

And to prove my point, this is going to be my first post...I don't know when I will write next, or what I will write about...but yes, write I shall.